Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Doraemon in Pakistan

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Note: CSD#G5 is for creations by confirmed socks or banned users, and is not used for creations of suspected socks. Vanamonde (Talk) 03:00, 13 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Doraemon in Pakistan

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Wholly uncited, would have moved it to draft, but for some reason I keep getting a "title protected" error message. Appears to be a fork of Doraemon in India. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 01:05, 6 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Anime and manga-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 01:08, 6 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Comment I wouldn't be shocked if you could scrape together an article about the proposed ban on Doraemon in Pakistan from a few years ago (it's not clear to me to what extent any such ban was ever enforced). But this isn't that article. Delete unless someone wants to start drafting said article. _signed,Rosguill ^talk 02:03, 6 August 2019 (UTC) 06:05, 11 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 04:47, 6 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Pakistan-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 04:47, 6 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Question: Why is this transcluded in Indian Deletion sorting list? §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 10:19, 6 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Note: See this link regarding the "title protected" part. FoxyGrampa75 (talk) 20:29, 6 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Delete totally uncited. I see no reason to keep this article. Fails WP:GNG. I won't oppose if you draftify it. Masum Reza^📞 08:06, 8 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Delete and consider G5 since creator is suspected sock. FoxyGrampa75 (talk) 05:31, 11 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.