Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Double Bullseye

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Result: Merge and redirect (non-admin closure) as any relevant content can be merged with List of The Price Is Right pricing games and the article redirected. The pricing game was only around 21 days and was not a long lasting notable game on the The Price is Right. Mr. C.C.^{Hey yo!}_{I didn't do it!} 06:04, 28 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Double Bullseye

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Article is about a pricing game that was played on The Price is Right over a period of only 21 days almost 38 years ago. Article is not notable and completely unsourced. Also, article topic already covered in List of The Price Is Right pricing games article. Nomination follows similar discussions in related AFDs Sottolacqua (talk) 19:34, 13 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. —Sottolacqua (talk) 19:42, 13 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:37, 20 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Delete No individual notability, no sources. Ten Pound Hammer, his otters and a clue-bat • ^{(Many otters • One bat • One hammer)} 01:19, 20 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Merge any relevant content to List of The Price Is Right pricing games and redirect, rather than deleting. Stifle (talk) 08:14, 20 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Merge per Stifle. Glenfarclas (talk) 17:52, 20 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Merge and redirect per above. Mr. C.C.^{Hey yo!}_{I didn't do it!} 03:59, 21 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Merge and redirect as per Stifle's merge reasoning and Glenfarclas' redirect reasoning as well. This article fails the notability guidelines and has no reliable sources to cover this article. Sjones23 (talk - contributions) 19:17, 24 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.