Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Double heading
Appearance
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. Eddie891 Talk Work 14:14, 26 November 2021 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Double heading (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
No sources since 2008. Fails WP:V Slender (talk) 10:39, 19 November 2021 (UTC)
- Keep, passes WP:GNG per the significant coverage in multiple independent secondary sources.[1][2][3]
References
- ^ Smith, Dave (2018). Double-Headed Trains. Amberley Publishing. ISBN 9781445673646.
- ^ Thomas, Gilbert; Thomas, David St. John (1963). Double Headed, Two Generations of Railway Enthusiasm. David & Charles. ISBN 9780715340356.
- ^ van Dyk, L. (2008). "Double-header trains at Great Noligwa mine" (pdf). Journal of the Southern African Institute of Mining and Metallurgy. 108 (4): 217–221.
SailingInABathTub (talk) 11:53, 19 November 2021 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Transportation-related deletion discussions. Spiderone(Talk to Spider) 16:00, 19 November 2021 (UTC)
- Keep Like many articles on trains, this is in a sorry state and sorely needs both references and a rewrite. However, there's plenty of SIGCOV to justify keeping the article. Trainsandotherthings (talk) 16:05, 19 November 2021 (UTC)
- Keep Evidently notable given the sources shared above. NemesisAT (talk) 16:06, 19 November 2021 (UTC)
- Keep quite notable; Wikipedia:NOIMPROVEMENT is not a reason to delete. There are many sources, and it is a railway topic that is definite notable due to the worldwide usage. Gorden 2211 (talk) 09:46, 20 November 2021 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.