Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dragonology

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) Arun Kumar SINGH (Talk) 05:24, 3 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Dragonology

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Zero indep references; no evidence of notability separate from parent series. —swpb^T 12:31, 26 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Keep as it is a series overview article. The main book of the series has an article and it appears to meet GNG. If from there we have what is an apparently large series, this article makes logical sense, at least as a List article. Needs a ton of work, but quality and notability are two separate issues. Montanabw ^(talk) 00:02, 27 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep as a quick sweep of Google brings up quite a few sources that look reliable and in-depth. White Arabian Filly ^Neigh 22:22, 27 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep, come on!, this is about dragons, of course its notable, meets WP:GNG, thanks to improvements by Tokyogirl79, there are more book reviews available, other titles could actually have their own article ie. The Dragonology Chronicles: The Dragon's Eye, reviews by pw, bookList, School Library Journal [1], and Kirkus [2]Coolabahapple (talk) 05:21, 30 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 05:23, 30 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Merge with Ologies (series), with which it appears to be redundant. Note that the article on the first book in the series is Dragonology: The Complete Book of Dragons, which is NOT up for deletion. Jclemens (talk) 06:46, 30 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.