Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dreams of Liberty: Panacea

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was userfy. User:Kohlpariah/Dreams of Liberty: Panacea Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:38, 4 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Dreams of Liberty: Panacea

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This movie does not appear to meet the notability criteria for films. I am unable to locate significant third party coverage of this film. Prod was contested by author. VQuakr (talk) 05:54, 19 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. — • Gene93k (talk) 23:01, 20 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Userfy this brand new article to its new editor Kohlpariah for contined work as its current state is unacceptable. The film has been screened,[1] and been the recipient of critical commentary in sources such as [RS!] Missoulian [2] and [RS?] Sovereign Independent [3] but the article needs drastic overhaul, because as currently written it is not sutable for mainspace. In his userspace, he can keep working and get input from more experienced editors. Schmidt, ^{MICHAEL Q.} 03:57, 21 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Sandstein 06:04, 27 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Userfy per Schmidt. Crisco 1492 (talk) 23:59, 3 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.