Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/DriveSavers (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Keep. Tim Vickers (talk) 04:44, 10 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

DriveSavers

Assisted listing that was requested at WT:AFD by Headbomb. Headbomb's rationale there was "Vanity page for a corporation". I personally have no opinion on this deletion discussion and my listing it should not be taken as a !vote either way. —/Mendaliv/^2¢/_Δ's/ 02:17, 4 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Comment The first AFD was closed 3 years ago as "delete". It's doubtful CSD G4 would apply but perhaps an admin could do a look-see anyway. --Ron Ritzman (talk) 02:30, 4 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Keep and cleanup. Looks like somebody's PR team got a little over-zealous on article text, but they're easily sourced and notable. Ronabop (talk) 04:44, 5 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Tips appreciated. I would like to keep within the guidelines and do apologize for the heavy article text. I will try to add more sources and remove text that is not necessary, but would also appreciate any additional tips to satisfy any other concerns. Mfisherkirshner (talk) 11:52, 6 April 2009 (UTC) —Preceding unsigned comment added by 173.8.168.129 (talk) [reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, MBisanz ^talk 00:08, 9 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.