Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Drivelest
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was deletion. -- Ed (Edgar181) 13:26, 18 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Drivelest (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • AfD statistics)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Delete as a dictionary definition, per WP:DICDEF. I didn't see a speedy delete for this so I listed it here. —ems24 00:15, 16 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. Unequivocal WP:DICDEF. — Rankiri (talk) 01:55, 16 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete -- as drivel, and a definition not appropriate for Wikipedia. (Is this a paroday of Wikipedia inclusionism? It really is, pure drivel.) N2e (talk) 02:24, 16 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete, fails WP:DICDEF and WP:MADEUP. Word to the (wise) nom; use a PROD in future. Ironholds (talk) 02:27, 16 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete, dictionary definition for a word made up at school one day. No references or sources. JIP | Talk 06:29, 16 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - not even worthy of the dictionary discussion. This article actually describes itself. DOOMSDAYER520 (Talk|Contribs) 14:13, 16 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - non-notable neologism, unreferenced essay, original research. Baffle gab1978 (talk) 06:47, 18 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.