Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Duluth 2030
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. WP:SNOW case. PeaceNT (talk) 15:27, 17 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Very short (one sentence), not much information, no references, and does not attempt to assert notability. Original author may have a conflict of interest. GW_SimulationsUser Page | Talk 19:49, 16 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete It might be notable on the Duluth, Georgia page, but definitely doesn't need its own page Ctjf83 20:13, 16 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete I can imagine the project this article refers to having some significance at some point, but for now, a one-sentence reference in the city's article is sufficient. Article author's COI is potential problem. -- MKoltnow (talk) 20:26, 16 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. The city's website confirms that the plan is being developed, but doesn't suggest there's much that can be written about it yet. The plan may turn out to be notable further down the line, but even then it would be better to start with a section in Duluth, Georgia and split if it became long enough. -- EALacey (talk) 21:08, 16 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete I (briefly) made it a redirect, but I mistook to AFD tag as a PROD tag. —ScouterSig 21:51, 16 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - until there's some sort of information about it, it doesn't seem like it's notable. I am impressed though. That page has the highest templates to content ratio I've ever seen. mattbuck (talk) 23:25, 16 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Speedy delete as {{db-empty}}. --Calton | Talk 13:49, 17 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- I tried that before I brought the discussion here, but it was rejected. --GW_SimulationsUser Page | Talk 13:54, 17 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.