Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dunav osiguranje

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. KaisaL (talk) 02:38, 1 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Dunav osiguranje

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Not enough references to qualify for notability guidelines TJH2018 talk 21:59, 17 March 2017 (UTC) *Speedy Delete Per CA7M, less than notable un-sourced company.L3X1 (distant write) 21:57, 18 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Serbia-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 03:58, 20 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 03:58, 20 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy keep per WP:BEFORE: If there are verifiability, notability or other sourcing concerns, take reasonable steps to search for reliable sources; If the article can be fixed through normal editing, then it is not a candidate for AfD. and The minimum search expected is a normal Google search, a Google Books search, a Google News search, none of which has apparently been performed by the nominator or by L3X1. This is the largest Serbian insurance company, traded at BELEX and worth €260M in assets. A mere news search produces 3300 results, which include SEE News, Blic [1][2], [3], [4], [5]; SEEbiz, Politika, InSerbia, all of that just from 2016-17, with mentions even in Financial Times. The current state of referencing is far from stellar, with most sources and links going to their own website, but that alone is not a reason for deletion per policy: per WP:NEXIST Notability is based on the existence of suitable sources, not on the state of sourcing in an article. No such user (talk) 09:43, 20 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep In addition to various searches in Latin script, only one of which is mentioned above, producing thousands of potential sources, Cyrillic script searches could also be run. Colin McTroll (talk) 15:18, 23 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - as my nomination.CAPTAIN RAJU (✉) 19:15, 24 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, J 947 21:39, 24 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. It's not OK that the article only cites references from the company itself, but it's equally obvious that this is a note-worthy business. Mortee (talk) 13:45, 26 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per Capt. Raju. L3X1 (distant write) 00:30, 27 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep I don't know if i have a right to give a vote because of objectivty (i have created this page). I have to write here that Dunav osiguranje is one of key companies in Serbian economy. The company is famous because of it is the leader in the insurance market of Serbia and because of social responisblity. Dunav osiguranje gives big donations/sponsorships to medical institutions, art (there is a section Dunav ars - paintings, many movies were sponsored by Dunav osiguranje etc.), sports, science etc. This reponsible, supstantial developement concept is unique in the Balkans region. I agree that more references should be in this article and i will work on it if this article stays on wiki. I am sorry for some errors in typing, i will correct tham in the future period. Best regards, Mihailo79 (talk) 10:59, 29 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.