Jump to content

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dying for Tomorrow

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Michael_Moorcock_bibliography#Other_collections. More pedantically: No argument was made that the book was notable. j⚛e deckertalk 15:01, 8 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Dying for Tomorrow (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Reason Mikeblas (talk) 14:01, 13 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

@Mikeblas: - what is your reason for deletion? Chris857 (talk) 14:55, 13 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:21, 13 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:21, 13 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Science fiction-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:21, 13 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Well, that's weird. Why didn't it get saved? It's a short-story collection that doesn't meet WP:NBOOK. Pretty difficult to research because of the name change when it was reprinted, but AFAICT it doesn't meet notability. -- Mikeblas (talk) 04:50, 15 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, NorthAmerica1000 01:54, 21 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, NorthAmerica1000 01:57, 29 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.