Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dyson tree
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or on a Votes for Undeletion nomination). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the debate was KEEP The Land 09:19, 29 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Doesn't seem like it should have its own article. - 203.134.166.99 07:37, 23 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep - why not? Vizjim 08:15, 23 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep. Could be a fine article, after some attention, if its verifiable. Jkelly 08:20, 23 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep, per Jkelly. Proposer hasn't made a case for deletion. Stephen Turner 08:30, 23 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep. Not only is it a known named idea, it has been extensively used in science fiction. Article should be expanded. --JahJah 08:38, 23 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep Expansion should start with a source on where Dyson first proposed it rather than how Sci-fi has run with the idea. Marskell 12:12, 23 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment - Hmmm, an article about a hypothetical genetically modified tree that can grow on a comet? I want some of whatever Dyson is smoking.
- No vote, but if this stands, nobody better complain when I post an article about Isotope's Lounger a hypothetical La-Z-Boy that pops into existance due to a Quantum fluctuation... complete with beer and chips.--Isotope23 17:16, 23 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep and expand. Somewhat notable in both science and SF. Does Isotope's Lounger include a beverage pocket in the armrest? Barno 19:00, 23 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep i see no reason to delete this article.--Alhutch 23:07, 23 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep, of course. Needs some more content, but certainly by no means obscure or non-notable. Rsynnott 00:23, 24 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep, because Freeman Dyson was da bomb, yo! If he came up with it, it's gold. -- BD2412 talk 02:42, 24 September 2005 (UTC)
- Keep and expand, notable enough. Shauri 19:57, 24 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep Dyson is more important than Isotope23 :p ··gracefool |☺ 07:55, 26 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep and Expand or Merge with Freeman Dyson, notable enough as it can be already referred to in the Freeman Dyson article as an existing theory. Piecraft 13:51, 26 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Conditional Keep - if verified. -- Arthur Rubin 01:21, 27 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in an undeletion request). No further edits should be made to this page.