Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/E-verify

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Boldly redirected and closed-Since the merge has already taken place, all that's left is to re-direct it to the merge target. I see no point in leaving the afd open, therefore the close. NAC. Umbralcorax (talk) 02:57, 27 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

E-verify

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Relevant information from this article has been merged with a more complete article on E-Verify and therefore, this article, is no longer necessary Isprawl (talk) 21:34, 26 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. This article is basically the wikipedia equivalent of a transitional fossil. CuddlySatan (talk) 21:58, 26 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy keep and redirect to E-Verify. Following an article merge a redirect must be left to ensure the history reminans visible (see Wikipedia:Merging), and "Other capitalisation" is a normal basis for a redirect anyway. EALacey (talk) 23:20, 26 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy Keep and Redirect as per EALacey Dylanfromthenorth (talk) 23:24, 26 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy Merge and Redirect This article with the lower case v is the result of a typo/ spelling related article fork. The article with the upper-case V is the way the actual program lists itself. Unnecessarily confusing and and misleading. Scott P. (talk) 00:16, 27 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.