Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Earth technology in Stargate
Appearance
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Kurykh (talk) 04:30, 21 March 2017 (UTC)
- Earth technology in Stargate (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
In-universe speculation and original research about fictional technology. Only references given are back to wikipedia itself. Complete fan-cruft, nothing salvageable. Mikeblas (talk) 15:38, 5 March 2017 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fictional elements-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 16:09, 5 March 2017 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Science fiction-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 16:09, 5 March 2017 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. I like the show, but this is pure 100% fancruft/in-universe trivia. Clarityfiend (talk) 06:14, 6 March 2017 (UTC)
- See also: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ancient technology in Stargate, a related topic which was deleted about eight months ago. -- Mikeblas (talk) 01:17, 7 March 2017 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Jenks24 (talk) 12:11, 13 March 2017 (UTC)
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Jenks24 (talk) 12:11, 13 March 2017 (UTC)
- Delete- this is among the cruftiest things I have seen on Wikipedia. Poorly sourced, full of speculation. Reyk YO! 19:44, 15 March 2017 (UTC)
- Delete as it appears to be primarily Wikipedia:Listcruft. Aoba47 (talk) 15:23, 17 March 2017 (UTC)
- Delete - Fails WP:GNG.CAPTAIN RAJU (✉) 18:32, 20 March 2017 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.