Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/EasyCap

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 20:34, 24 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

EasyCap

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Doesn't pass WP:GNG. RileyBugz ^会話 _投稿記録 21:52, 17 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - No indication of general notability. Robert McClenon (talk) 03:16, 18 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete No indication of significance or notability when limited sources are taken into account.--SamHolt6 (talk) 13:32, 18 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Strong Delete Should have been Speedy Delete. Zazzysa (talk) 07:13, 19 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete failure to clear the GNG. Possible A7, but with the possibility of notabilities on GNEWs, I think that AfD was better that CSD. L3X1 (distænt write) )evidence( 15:47, 24 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.