Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/EasyMOD

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Punkmorten (talk) 08:56, 26 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

EasyMOD

As pitiful an article as Habari is, this article manages to be even worse. No secondary sources, what-so-ever. I know, I know... as in the case of Habari, benefit of the doubt ought to be given on the basis that the about page states "articles and subject areas sometimes suffer from significant omissions", but that was bullshit then and it's bullshit now. Misterdiscreet (talk) 15:44, 17 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Non-notable software. VasileGaburici (talk) 10:23, 18 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
keep. if it was bullshit, you would have won. that you didn't should be proof enough for anyone that it isn't 85.17.45.118 (talk) 14:55, 21 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- I am disregarding this opinion, as it is incomprehensible. Punkmorten (talk) 08:56, 26 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Don't take it personally, it's just that the article doesn't have enough information to establish notability. If you feel I am wrong, refactor/rewrite the article citing sources that prove it's notability. Psychcf (talk) 02:24, 22 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, — Xy7 (talk) 02:03, 22 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Nothing notable about this software that I can find. JBsupreme (talk) 04:43, 22 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, no reliable sources, no notability. Huon (talk) 14:38, 22 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.