Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ecotarian (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Courcelles 23:50, 12 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Ecotarian

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Previously deleted as differing names and concepts (Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ecotarianism and Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ecotarian). No reliable sources provided. Searches find numerous blogs and such, but nothing reliable. SummerPhD (talk) 17:06, 5 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Comment - Note that the talk page gives two, um, less than useful origins for this neologism: "My friend Jessica coined this term before the date/place listed in the article. She introduced the term at a food conference in England, and we have been using it ever since. There is a term paper with the word in it, but it was never published. So as a way to get the term "out there", we made a wikipedia page. So - i propose changing the origin section to reflect all of these developments (please see the new section for my content edits)." and "I have self defined by this term (and other synonyms) since at least summer 2005 after attending a particularly significant UN summit. I could probably find evidence of this, however I'm not sure that the specific origin is particularly relevant and have changed the article to reflect this ambiguity." Talk:Ecotarian#Origin - SummerPhD (talk) 17:10, 5 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Food and drink-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 22:37, 5 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Environment-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 22:37, 5 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Non-notable neologism. DinosaurDan (talk) 23:39, 7 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as per nom and DinosaurDan. Stuartyeates (talk) 21:58, 12 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.