Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ed Zitron

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. A Train^talk 21:26, 3 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Ed Zitron

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable PR person. All sources are lacking in actual coverage. Almost everything I can find is a passing mention or written by the subject. Fails GNG and pretty much everything... CHRISSYMAD ❯❯❯¯\_(ツ)_/¯ 23:37, 27 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete A preliminary WP:BEFORE showed simply passing mentions or one-off quotes. Drewmutt (^ᴥ^) talk 23:38, 27 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete- Looks like one of his PR specialties is writing wikipedia articles to promote.--Rusf10 (talk) 03:13, 28 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. Happy holidays! ^{Babymissfortune} 03:33, 28 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. Happy holidays! ^{Babymissfortune} 03:33, 28 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. Happy holidays! ^{Babymissfortune} 03:34, 28 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. Happy holidays! ^{Babymissfortune} 03:34, 28 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete a non-notable PR man.John Pack Lambert (talk) 04:39, 28 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Most references are articles written by the subject. No in depth coverage. Fails both WP:BIO and WP:GNG. --Crystallizedcarbon (talk) 20:55, 28 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete – sources do not have in depth coverage about the subject or work that he has done that is of significant value to public relations. Fails WP:GNG. CookieMonster755 ✉ 20:37, 29 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. AdWeek/Business Insider gave him awards for his accomplishments in his industry.[1][2] He also has a unique style and is an author.desmay (talk) 00:03, 2 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.