Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Eddie Ellison

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎. ✗plicit 23:36, 18 September 2023 (UTC)

Eddie Ellison

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

• How to contribute
• Introduction to deletion process
• Guide to deletion (glossary)
• Help, my article got nominated for deletion!

Eddie Ellison (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:NBIO and WP:GNG. I'm not seeing any sources of him for passing notability. Tails Wx 23:55, 11 September 2023 (UTC)

• Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Police, United Kingdom, and England. Tails Wx 23:55, 11 September 2023 (UTC)
• Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Politics-related deletion discussions. Skynxnex (talk) 04:45, 12 September 2023 (UTC)

• Delete. Non-notable detective that fails WP:NBIO and WP:GNG, with no reliable sources on him.

FatCat96 (talk) 20:15, 12 September 2023 (UTC)

• Delete. Completely unsourced article about a person who had a job, which is claiming absolutely nothing that would make him "inherently" more notable than other people who had jobs. I'll grant that since I don't have particularly good access to archived British media coverage from 15-20 years ago, it's remotely possible that he might actually have a stronger notability claim, and better reliable source support for it, than this shows — so I'm willing to reconsider this if somebody who does have access to the necessary resources can find enough to salvage it — but this, as written, is not up to a keepable standard at all. Bearcat (talk) 15:18, 16 September 2023 (UTC)
• Delete per nom and above fails WP:GNG.Pharaoh of the Wizards (talk) 08:07, 17 September 2023 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.