Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Eddie Scarry

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. czar 09:24, 30 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Eddie Scarry

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Searches have simply found simple mentions, nothing suggesting the needed substance for his own notability, the listed sources are also not sufficiently convincing. SwisterTwister talk 04:24, 16 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. SwisterTwister talk 04:24, 16 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. Yellow Dingo (talk) 07:02, 16 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Journalism-related deletion discussions. Yellow Dingo (talk) 07:02, 16 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. Yellow Dingo (talk) 07:02, 16 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Washington, D.C.-related deletion discussions. Yellow Dingo (talk) 07:02, 16 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Politics-related deletion discussions. Yellow Dingo (talk) 07:02, 16 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - writer for minor blogs and less-than-reliable news sources. 17:47, 22 July 2016 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Bearian (talk • contribs)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 03:18, 23 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete non-notable blogger and journalist, who has gotten interviews with notable people, but it is extremely rare getting an interview makes one notable, we would have to have lots of coverage from reliable sources of how important this interview is to justify such an article.John Pack Lambert (talk) 14:13, 23 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete non-notable writer Prevan (talk) 23:47, 23 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.