Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Edson Claas Vieira
Tools
Actions
General
Print/export
In other projects
Appearance
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Mark Arsten (talk) 03:41, 9 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Edson Claas Vieira (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Fails WP:NMMA. Two fights for PRIDE. LlamaAl (talk) 21:31, 2 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Subject has fought for Pride Fighting Championships but
it is not recognized as a top-tier promotion at WP:MMATIER andultimately does not meet WP:NMMA. No significant coverage outside WP:ROUTINE for his events and does not meet WP:GNG as the alternate policy. Mkdwtalk 21:59, 2 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- PRIDE is indeed a top tier organization. But he has to have at least three fights for TT MMA promotions to meet WP:NMMA. --LlamaAl (talk) 22:02, 2 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Agreed. Not sure how I missed that. Mkdwtalk 22:09, 2 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- PRIDE is indeed a top tier organization. But he has to have at least three fights for TT MMA promotions to meet WP:NMMA. --LlamaAl (talk) 22:02, 2 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Has only 2 of the 3 top tier fights required to meet [[WP:NMMA].Mdtemp (talk) 20:41, 5 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Brazil-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:52, 7 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Martial arts-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:52, 7 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:52, 7 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.