Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Edudigm (2nd nomination)
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. LFaraone 00:25, 31 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
AfDs for this article:
- Edudigm (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
No secondary reliable source, only present here as an unencyclopedic promotional material Solomon7968 (talk) 17:38, 23 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 14:24, 24 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Schools-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 14:24, 24 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete as more non-notable promotional rubbish. Of the sources, one is just a link to a series of news stories not mentioning the subject, one is a listing which appears to have been placed by representatives of the subject and one is a brief mention. No significant coverage found elsewhere. MezzoMezzo (talk) 03:57, 26 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.