Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Eliyahu Lizorkin

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. -- RoySmith (talk) 12:04, 26 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Eliyahu Lizorkin

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This scholar does not seem to pass WP:SCHOLAR based on what is written in the article. Also, the article has no independent reliable sources. Instead, it looks very much like the information on this page, which is the place where he works. I performed Google searches for significant coverage in reliable sources but I was unsuccessful, so I don't think the article passes WP:BIO either. Even if we could find reliable sources to support all of the claims that are made in the article, I think it would still fail to pass WP:SCHOLAR and WP:BIO. Dontreader (talk) 21:29, 18 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. SwisterTwister talk 05:09, 23 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. SwisterTwister talk 05:09, 23 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Christianity-related deletion discussions. SwisterTwister talk 05:09, 23 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Judaism-related deletion discussions. SwisterTwister talk 05:09, 23 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Israel-related deletion discussions. SwisterTwister talk 05:09, 23 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Religion-related deletion discussions. SwisterTwister talk 05:09, 23 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions. SwisterTwister talk 05:09, 23 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as I found nothing good with this perhaps being the best link I found. SwisterTwister talk 05:10, 23 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Comment I agree, and that link seems to be to an article, not a book, so there's no evidence that the subject's work has ever been cited in a book. Dontreader (talk) 05:34, 23 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - not at all notable. I'm surprised it's lasted here so long. St Anselm (talk) 06:06, 23 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Keep -- He looks like a significant figure in Jewish-Christian relations. Peterkingiron (talk) 22:10, 23 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Delete- Not notable. The books are really his dissertations and some self-published kindle works. He is a young entry into the field who has not done anything except for several part-time jobs.--Jayrav (talk) 02:41, 24 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.