Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Elizabeth Jaikaran

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 00:06, 17 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Elizabeth Jaikaran

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

WP:BLP of a writer, not properly sourced as passing any WP:AUTHOR criterion. As always, every writer is not automatically entitled to a Wikipedia article just because she and her work exist -- she needs to attain a distinction that passes AUTHOR, and she needs to have the reliable source coverage in media to carry an article. But this is referenced exclusively to her staff profile on the self-published website of her own employer, a Q&A interview in which she's talking about herself rather than being analyzed in the third person by other people, and two blog entries -- which means that exactly zero of these are sources that assist in building notability at all. Bearcat (talk) 17:49, 9 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom, fails to meet any criteria set forth by WP:AUTHOR, and a majority of references are directly related to the subject. --HunterM267 ^talk 17:53, 9 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. Hhkohh (talk) 03:39, 10 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Law-related deletion discussions. Hhkohh (talk) 03:39, 10 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of New York-related deletion discussions. Hhkohh (talk) 03:39, 10 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete if no evidence of notability can be added. It's a bit hard on her as the criteria for inclusion of books seem to be lower than that for authors. Deb (talk) 13:03, 11 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 08:54, 12 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, does not meet WP:NAUTHOR or WP:GNG, Jaikaran's book has not been noticed by libraries (held by 2), a gsearch brings up no useable reviews, also nothing indepth about Jaikaran herself, may be a case of WP:TOOSOON? Coolabahapple (talk) 08:59, 12 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Way too soon for her to be established as notable.John Pack Lambert (talk) 22:39, 15 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.