Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Elsa Tauser

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to List of supercentenarians who died in 2007. MBisanz ^talk 00:16, 28 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Elsa Tauser

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Being the oldest German person (for one day) is not notable when the only sources are three WP:ROUTINE obituaries. Ricky81682 (talk) 21:04, 5 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

No objection to deletion. De minimis title holder. Bearian (talk) 22:12, 8 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect to appropriate list. Someone should talk to the police about the fact that she was predeceased by two children, six grandchildren, ten great-grandchildren and one great-great-grandchild; there's something fishy going on here. EEng (talk) 07:31, 9 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Delete should be on a list somewhere. All those deaths in the family... scary! Legacypac (talk) 09:34, 11 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Maybe List of supercentenarian serial killers? EEng (talk) 09:54, 11 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Sam Sailor ^Talk! 01:53, 13 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Germany-related deletion discussions. ssт✈^(discuss) 02:14, 13 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:14, 14 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect to relevant list. I partially agree with EEng, but without the disrespectful sarcasm regarding her having outlived some of her relatives. 930310 (talk) 16:54, 16 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, —UY Scuti ^Talk 18:09, 20 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

^^^Lacks sense of humor.Legacypac (talk) 06:54, 21 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.