Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Elsinore (band)
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. -- Cirt (talk) 23:35, 19 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Elsinore (band) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • AfD statistics)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Non-notable band. —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 19:01, 10 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. — Gongshow Talk 00:40, 11 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Weak Keep. Probably just enough coverage to demonstrate notability. The AV Club article is already linked, and there's also this from the St. Louis Post-Dispatch, as well as less refworthy further coverage in student newspaper the Daily Illini ([1], [2]). --Michig (talk) 08:43, 11 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - yet another indie band with one album and minimal "coverage". Rklawton (talk) 18:02, 11 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- "It's been a long road, but Elsinore still going full speed ahead" by Michael Miller in The News-Gazette, 25 February 2010. duffbeerforme (talk) 09:56, 12 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- My biggest problem with this article isn't that the band is non-notable; the whole article is a stub. If this isn't rectified soon, the article should remain candidate for deletion. --George The Man (talk) 03:58, 16 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Stub status is seldom a valid rationale for deletion. AfD is for articles that cannot be improved upon because they are non-notable or not verifiable. P. D. Cook Talk to me! 20:25, 17 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- My biggest problem with this article isn't that the band is non-notable; the whole article is a stub. If this isn't rectified soon, the article should remain candidate for deletion. --George The Man (talk) 03:58, 16 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep - This band will be releasing their debut full length this summer, paying for album promotion and touring extensively. Please keep them and give them another few months to develop meaningful content. Seems like they finally got their ducks in a row. --User:Transpanther (talk) 01:34, 16 April 2010
- Note User:Transpanther is a WP:SPA with only three edits - all related to this article/AfD. Rklawton (talk) 18:02, 16 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Arbitrarily0 (talk) 19:47, 17 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Weak keep - Probably just stumbles over WP:BAND #1 with the sources linked from the article and those mentioned by Michig. P. D. Cook Talk to me! 20:20, 17 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Weak keep per PdCook; also may pass WP:BAND #5 by this summer (2 major indie CDs). Bearian (talk) 17:06, 19 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.