Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Embassy of the United Kingdom, Quito

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. Hog Farm _Talk 18:01, 2 December 2021 (UTC)

Embassy of the United Kingdom, Quito

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

• How to contribute
• Introduction to deletion process
• Guide to deletion (glossary)
• Help, my article got nominated for deletion!

Embassy of the United Kingdom, Quito (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:GNG. Embassies are not inherently notable. All this article does is confirm the embassy exists. LibStar (talk) 02:34, 11 November 2021 (UTC)

• Comment Couldn't the article exist solely to confirm that the embassy exists because it is a stub? Couldn't it be expanded? --PerpetuityGrat (talk) 03:59, 11 November 2021 (UTC)
• Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Bilateral relations-related deletion discussions. Kpgjhpjm 09:57, 11 November 2021 (UTC)
• Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. Kpgjhpjm 09:57, 11 November 2021 (UTC)
• Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Ecuador-related deletion discussions. Kpgjhpjm 09:57, 11 November 2021 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 04:53, 18 November 2021 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Extraordinary Writ (talk) 04:58, 25 November 2021 (UTC)

• Delete. Nothing points to the building itself being notable. Geschichte (talk) 10:46, 25 November 2021 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.