Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Emergency War Order (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete and redirect to Single Integrated Operational Plan. Yunshui ^雲 _水 08:37, 3 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Emergency War Order

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

The content should be presumed to be dubious / falsified. Created by Special:Contributions/OberRanks currently site-banned for fabricating content and sources. For specific issues with the article, please see: User:Future_Perfect_at_Sunrise/OberRanks#Emergency_War_Order. For more info, please see ANI:OberRanks and fabricated sources. Delete per WP:TNT. K.e.coffman (talk) 01:20, 26 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Update: I have no objection to delete & redirect as suggested below. K.e.coffman (talk) 04:48, 28 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Military-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 22:26, 26 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 22:26, 26 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect (delete content) to Single Integrated Operational Plan. As might be seen in a BEFORE (e.g. [1][2]) - this term is used and is a plausible search term, and would seem to pass GNG in my view. However, with the state of the article (and the well developed SIOP) - a redirect is in order. Icewhiz (talk) 08:56, 27 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Delete then Redirect. I think the current contents need to be deleted as probably fabricated. But then the creation of a redirect to Single Integrated Operational Plan seems sensible. Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 08:53, 28 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Note at the earlier deletion nomination at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Emergency War Order, article creator OberRanks said he "mainly relied on my military knowledge and the information from the external link which is now deactivated". Even for an honest editor, relying on one's own military knowledge is unacceptable as sourcing, but for OberRanks we've repeatedly seen that what that really means is he made it up. Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 06:56, 29 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.