Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Emily Wong (pageant)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Courcelles (talk) 03:07, 24 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Emily Wong (pageant)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Doesn't meet the criteria of WP:ENTERTAINER B dash (talk) 14:42, 16 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. L293D (☎ • ✎) 15:32, 16 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of China-related deletion discussions. L293D (☎ • ✎) 15:32, 16 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 12:50, 17 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete coming third place in a Hong Kong pageant is not a claim of notability, and I see no other claim of notability. The refs are all in Chinese and are trivial coverage of her in the context of the pageant. power~enwiki (π, ν) 23:03, 17 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Delete coming in 3rd place in any beauty pageant is not a sign of notability, in a beauty pageant for a city-state even less so.John Pack Lambert (talk) 03:52, 19 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.