Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Empires (video game)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Ks0stm ^{(T•C•G•E)} 23:09, 30 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Empires (video game)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable mod with no substantive independent sourcing, by non-notable modder. Guy (Help!) 15:46, 23 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

delete restored from PROD, but without actual sourcing being added. The one RS doesn't mention the topic - David Gerard (talk) 18:25, 23 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]
A reference to https://www.gamingonlinux.com/articles/empires-a-source-sdk-hybrid-of-fps-and-strategy-looks-like-its-coming-to-linux.6545 was added today. Thexa4 (talk) 14:28, 25 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Video games-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 06:41, 24 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete -- no indications of notability or significance. The above link is not RS. K.e.coffman (talk) 06:03, 30 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Unless author or editors can add sources ASAP from reliable / independent media (ideally national/international) to support notability, article should be deleted as no support for notability whatsoever. I've completed a quick google search, and nothing of note turns up that might support notability. Newtonslaw40 (talk) 16:05, 30 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.