Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Enhanced translation

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Computer-assisted translation. (non-admin closure) Armbrust, B.Ed. ^{Let's talk}_{about my edits?} 12:15, 9 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Enhanced translation

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

A neologism. The article has no references, so there is no evidence that this term is notable. Prod was contested without explanation, so bringing here for discussion. Sparthorse (talk) 10:11, 2 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Language-related deletion discussions. —Tom Morris (talk) 15:03, 2 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect to Computer-assisted translation. The author of the article says themselves that the term was introduced in 2010 by a translation company. In addition to this, I don't find anything obvious when searching Google Books, which makes me agree with the nominator in saying that it is a neologism. The subject itself sounds very similar indeed to computer-assisted translation, and I don't see any content in the article that isn't in computer-assisted translation already. However, I think it is possible that people may search for "enhanced translation", so I think a redirect would be most appropriate. — Mr. Stradivarius ^♫ 08:25, 6 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.