Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Environment segments

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedily deleted per A7 (housekeeping NAC). Writ Keeper ⚇♔ 13:35, 18 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Environment segments

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

A certain je ne sais quoi; I'm having a little trouble putting it into words. It seems to be a loose gathering of bits of information and ideas, but there's no really coherent, overarching topic. (How can the biosphere be one of the four segments if it's made up of the other three?) Also directly copied from here; the site says it's released under "a Creative Commons license", so that's probably okay, though the lack of attribution is still a problem. Writ Keeper ⚇♔ 15:00, 17 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Environment-related deletion discussions. —Tom Morris (talk) 17:00, 17 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, nothing here that's not covered elsewhere (at, eg: Natural environment). Hairhorn (talk) 19:44, 17 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per all the above and it is not a useful topic name. -- Alan Liefting (talk - contribs) 20:28, 17 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.