Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Epona (IRC services)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Ronhjones ^(Talk) 01:50, 19 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Epona (IRC services)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This is a contested prod where the reason given for the prod was "Non-notable software and tagged for lack of sources since May 2008.". The articles does not appear to meet WP:WEB or WP:N so I am nominating it for deletion after restoring the article. Spartaz ^Humbug! 06:18, 12 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Delete This does not meet our notability criteria, has no sources, and 18 months is enough to find them. Miami33139 (talk) 07:23, 12 December 2009 (UTC) I also oppose a redirect unless at least one third party source is found. Miami33139 (talk) 08:44, 13 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: I can't find significant coverage for this software. Joe Chill (talk) 14:10, 12 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete unless sourced. I checked the usual places and found nothing. --Sancho Mandoval (talk) 14:22, 12 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Unable to find reliable sources to confirm notability Triplestop x3 23:15, 16 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, no assertion of notability, and I can't find any evidence of notability. --Stormie (talk) 06:11, 18 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.