Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ernst Christian Wilhelm Ackermann
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. Originally closed "keep" by BusterD, reclosing to fix formatting (non-admin closure) Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:31, 16 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Ernst Christian Wilhelm Ackermann (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
nn person there is no assertion of notability. Oo7565 (talk) 08:48, 9 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep Another encyclopedic work already deemed him notable and Wikipedia should strive to cover the conventional encyclopedic knowledge as well as the more uncommon stuff. - Mgm|(talk) 09:34, 9 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep anyone with an entry in a selective national biography is notable for our purposes also should be no trouble expanding the article, and I am a little surprised nobody at deWP has done so yet.DGG (talk) 09:56, 9 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep per above. Punkmorten (talk) 10:31, 9 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep as per everyone but the nominator. Edward321 (talk) 14:03, 9 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep. Unfortunately the German wikipedia article is similar to this one, but at least it has an additional source (which I've added to the article). Suggest snow close should be considered.—S Marshall Talk/Cont 16:54, 9 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep per Mgm and DGG. --Rosiestep (talk) 02:04, 10 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep. per inclusion in the German Wikipedia alone, which as I understand has stricter -- or better enforced -- standards for inclusion than we do. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 18:43, 11 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.