Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ethan Bear

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete--Anthony Bradbury^"talk" 13:42, 26 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Ethan Bear

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:GNG (per WP:ROUTINE). Fails WP:NHOCKEY and is very much WP:TOOSOON Yosemiter (talk) 18:09, 19 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom, fails all criteria listed, plus WP:NOTCRYSTAL. - SanAnMan (talk) 18:53, 19 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: Undistinguished NN amateur player, fails NHOCKEY, no evidence that he meets the GNG. Ravenswing 19:30, 19 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - No evidence of notability. Rlendog (talk) 20:18, 19 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. GabeIglesia (talk) 21:51, 19 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete fails WP:GNG and WP:NHOCKEY.--Michiquito (talk) 01:35, 23 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Canada-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 03:04, 24 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - fails GNG and NHOCKEY at this point. Ajraddatz (talk) 03:10, 24 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]
SNOW Delete as nothing convincing for his own article. SwisterTwister talk 21:55, 25 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.