Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Euro- Mediterranean Human Rights Monitor

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Spartaz ^Humbug! 00:02, 30 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Euro- Mediterranean Human Rights Monitor

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Article about a non-notable organisation, created by an editor with a declared conflict of interest and sourced only to the organisation themselves and a short mention on the website of another similar organisation. Thomas.W ^talk 12:37, 26 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: Since being nominated for deletion the article has been moved from Euro- Mediterranean Human Rights Monitor to Euro-Mediterranean Human Rights Monitor to correct a typo in the name, so please note that this nomination is about the article, not just the redirect. Thomas.W ^talk 06:30, 29 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as non-notable organisation.--Yopie (talk) 18:46, 26 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 11:54, 27 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Middle East-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 11:54, 27 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Africa-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 11:54, 27 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Switzerland-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 11:54, 27 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 04:35, 2 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Sam Sailor ^Talk! 04:41, 9 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

keep for now. It is very unlikely that an international human rights organisation based and registered in Geneva is non-notable. A pity that there are so few sources in English, but chances are that sources in other languages (notably Arabic) exist. This is a case where we have to beware of systemic bias. Reserving final judgement until I've had a chance to look for more sources, including foreign-language sources. --NSH001 (talk) 00:06, 16 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: To give NSH001 time to work on it. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 20:24, 17 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Onel5969 ^{TT me} 20:24, 17 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

comment It was founded in the wake of the Arab Spring, a very optomistic moment for human rights in the Arab world. It may have just sort of faded, never gotten proper funding... Could explain why it is "registered in Geneva", but doesn't seem to do much.E.M.Gregory (talk) 12:39, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Doesn't appear to meet WP:ORG. clpo13_(talk) 17:14, 29 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.