Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Evangelical Free Baptist Church (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. ♠PMC♠ (talk) 00:59, 10 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Evangelical Free Baptist Church

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:NONPROFIT. There are no reliable sources to indicate that the subject of the article (a denomination that was based in Addison, IL in the 1980s and might be connected to an organization based out of a home in North Aurora, IL) was ever national or international in scale. The denomination has not received WP:SIGCOV in multiple reliable sources independent of the subject. The denomination is mentioned in one book by a Baptist publisher, which does show that it did exist at one time (with fewer members in the entire denomination than many individual churches), but there are no sources to indicate whether the denomination still exists in any form, or when they folded. There are also other Baptist churches around the world that have "Evangelical Free" in their name that are not affiliated with this denomination. "Evangelical Free" is a common term, and there are many unaffiliated Baptist churches. The previous deletion discussion in 2013 ended with no consensus and there have been no improvements to the article since that time. Tdl1060 (talk) 03:29, 24 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. Tdl1060 (talk) 03:29, 24 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Christianity-related deletion discussions. Tdl1060 (talk) 03:29, 24 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Vanamonde (Talk) 04:57, 31 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per WP:MILL. Tiny denomination. Bearian (talk) 00:40, 6 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: per above. Nope, sorry, the prior AfD closed with a lot of sentiment to Give People Time To Source The Article. Seven years later, plainly no one could be bothered. No prejudice against recreation if anyone comes up with any sources, but we can't keep a GNG-fail around indefinitely on the off chance. Ravenswing 05:47, 9 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.