Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Evercookie

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy keep, nomination withdrawn, no one else wanted to delete this. - Smerdis of Tlön - killing the human spirit since 2003! 00:19, 31 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Evercookie

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Never establishes notability, reads like an advertisment for a Firefox add-on. Doc Strange^MailboxLogbook 18:41, 27 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 16:33, 28 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Keep, due to coverage by Schneier, arstechnica, and threatpost. Schneier writes for reliable sources such as magazine on security issues and is a recognized expert. Arstechnica is generally pretty reliable, I think, and Kaspersky Labs is also reliable on computer related security issues. See also Info Security article and this Network World article. Agree that article needs work but afd is not cleanup. --Nuujinn (talk) 16:48, 28 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Keep: a readable article, for which reliable sources are available. - Smerdis of Tlön - killing the human spirit since 2003! 15:33, 29 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Nomination withdrawn per Nuujinn's findings and the general removing of most of the advertising-esque text from the article. Doc Strange^MailboxLogbook 23:18, 30 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.