Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Extramarital sex (2nd nomination)
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. postdlf (talk) 23:53, 9 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
AfDs for this article:
- Extramarital sex (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
WP:CONTENTFORK of adultery. Deadbeef 06:52, 3 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep. Not a content fork since not all extramarital sex is adultery. The extramarital sex article needs some tweaking rather than deleting. They are also very popular topics (in theory and practice!) so deserve separate articles. -- Alan Liefting (talk - contribs) 06:59, 3 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep per Alan. Diego Moya (talk) 11:00, 3 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sexuality and gender-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:16, 3 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep per Alan - "not all extramarital sex is adultery". Ansh666 17:56, 3 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep and Rethink on the highest level (if there is such a thing here :-)). Adultery is a legal concept, and has a good article here. The general topic of extramarital sex is much broader and deserves a much better article. Consider that there are/have been hundreds if not thousands of cultures and legal systems and that the concept of marriage is not the same across them, and is in fact being redefined right now. How about a same-sex married couple where one, with the consent of the other, has heterosexual sex for the purpose of having a child? Let's have a section on that. But regardless keep the title alive since it's a topic many people are interested in, although I hardly need to say that. Kitfoxxe (talk) 19:30, 3 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Note. I didn't click on "free images" in my research to decide my vote. :-) -Kitfoxxe (talk) 19:56, 3 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep. per Alan. --Dede2008 (talk) 15:40, 4 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.