Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Extraterrestrials: A Field Guide for Earthlings

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete. —Wknight94 (talk) 03:39, 25 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Extraterrestrials: A Field Guide for Earthlings

I wrote this when I was a newbie, only concerned with generating articles. Looking at it now, its notability is questionable. Gray Porpoise_{Your wish is my command!} 21:16, 18 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Keep I don't see what is wrong with this book, its got an ISBN and could be expanded. --Daniel J. Leivick 21:22, 18 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete A good A7 candidate. I've added it to Terence Dickinson's publication list, since the book isn't notable even though its author is. Flakeloaf 21:26, 18 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Many non-notable books have ISBN numbers. The book does not require an article of its own. Also per Flakeloaf. Mkdw ^talk 21:34, 18 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete The ISBN thing is not an issue as many, many books have them,. But there is definatly a concern for notability. Arjun 01:13, 19 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Does not assert notibility. It needs to have links to media reviews/awards or something to determine that it is noteable. EVERY book has a ISBN number, an article for every book would probably be a couple billion extra pages over night.--155.144.251.120 02:15, 19 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per WP:N. | AndonicO ^{Talk · Sign Here} 00:06, 20 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per WP:N. | Noticket 15:06, 21 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect to Terence Dickinson. Redirects are cheap, it may be searched for, and internal links exist that ought to point somewhere. Mermaid from the Baltic Sea 00:23, 22 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.