Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Fardad Fateri

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. Star Mississippi 01:43, 7 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Fardad Fateri

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Appears to fail WP:BIO. The most notable thing I see is ", Fateri stated that 100% of the organization's grant of funds would be provided to the students." supported by ref #3 on the article, where the subject gets a minor mention. I do not see anything that meets "People are presumed notable if they have received significant coverage in multiple published" WP:BASIC. The article has had a previous prod and a couple of contested speed's. I looked for but did not find any other significant references that might meet WP:BASIC Jeepday (talk) 17:30, 15 June 2022 (UTC) Jeepday (talk) 17:30, 15 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Businesspeople and Iran. Shellwood (talk) 17:41, 15 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, RL0919 (talk) 18:34, 22 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. Positions include president of a notable university and president/CEO of two notable educational companies. Page has been infested by COI editors (with attempted effect of unduly positive WP:NPOV), but it appears neutral to me (I and others did a lot of cleanup over the years). A previous version was speedied, but the current seems substantially different. The two speedy's I see both seem out-of-process because there was already an objected PROD:
- Cbryant23 {{db-author}}, is author, it's not clear why Jeepday objected that it is "not a G7 request", given that this appears to be the author, but it does fail G7 because it has had substantial substantial editing by others
- Jeepday {{db-person}}, User:BangJan1999 objected for content reasons

Pinging User:MrX, who filed the PROD in 2013 (others involved in article history were already pinged). DMacks (talk) 15:52, 23 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 22:12, 29 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

As the original author I believe this meets G& for speedy Cbryant23 (talk) 20:51, 30 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.