Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Faro Technologies Inc.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. postdlf (talk) 17:09, 23 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Faro Technologies Inc.

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Looks like non-notable company. Vanjagenije (talk) 23:45, 4 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Florida-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 14:29, 5 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 14:29, 5 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 14:29, 5 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Keep - The current article is unreferenced, but they do appear to be makers of at least one notable product. A book search for FaroArm shows it is a notable product. [1], and [2] are a couple of example. -- Whpq (talk) 20:32, 10 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Keep This company is LISTED. While that alone does not ensure notability it does suggest that there is likly more coverage out there. So I did a quick search on LexisNexis and found many sources. I'll try to add a few today but it is clearly a notable company. JodyB_talk 14:28, 11 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
- I'd suggest someone speedy keep this. I have added sources from Standard and Poor's, Investors Business Daily and the Wall Street Journal. JodyB_talk 14:49, 11 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, NORTH AMERICA¹⁰⁰⁰ 04:09, 12 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Spirit of Eagle (talk) 04:08, 19 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Keep - Plenty of stock news jabber about this company. ~KvnG 05:13, 22 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.