Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Fatpipe networks

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. – Juliancolton | ^Talk 03:14, 10 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Fatpipe networks

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Not a notable corporation. Google search shows only the references that any company will have, and references to fat pipes as a term. References listed are local. Promotional. Robert McClenon (talk) 16:40, 2 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 16:52, 2 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 16:52, 2 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete -- corporate spam on a run-of-the-mill business. This content belongs on the company web site, not here. K.e.coffman (talk) 06:35, 7 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Utah-related deletion discussions. K.e.coffman (talk) 06:36, 7 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - as others have said this is a big ad. In addition to searches above, I checked HighBeam and found only press releases and routine announcements, mostly in local SLC outlets. WP:NCORP failure. Brianhe (talk) 01:59, 10 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.