Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Felix Montez

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. §FreeRangeFrog^croak 00:03, 25 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Felix Montez

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:NPOL and GNG requirements. (Not to mention devoid of references.) – S. Rich (talk) 20:32, 17 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Minnesota-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:58, 18 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Politicians-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:58, 18 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. It appears to be quite clear that his political career came to nothing. The fact that the article is 6 years out of date, and unreferenced, is a cautionary tale against lowering the notability bar too far. --Mkativerata (talk) 10:27, 18 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]
No strong claim of notability that would get him past WP:POLITICIAN (highest office ever attained is a municipal committee? er, no) — and the article relies exclusively on a user-generated database for referencing, without so much as a shred of reliable source coverage to explain why he would belong in an encyclopedia. In addition, the article was created by User:ProfLiberté, implying a potential conflict of interest as the article identifies its subject as a libertarian and the creator has never made any other contributions to Wikipedia at all. Delete. Bearcat (talk) 03:33, 20 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - I cannot find any evidence this person passes WP:GNG or WP:NPOL. -- Whpq (talk) 16:37, 22 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Holder of a postion so minor, that it would not make him notable in any city.John Pack Lambert (talk) 22:28, 23 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - at present he fails to pass WP:POLITICIAN and, separately, there are not the sources required to meet WP:GNG. The Whispering Wind (talk) 00:16, 24 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.