Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Feloni (4th nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was withdrawn. Maybe this really is the best cleanup venue after all... JBsupreme (talk) 07:15, 22 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Feloni

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Delete. This artist fails WP:MUSIC and general notability guidelines. Yes, she has received passing coverage by GO Magazine, and yes appeared on a reality television show (Coming Out Stories). We don't create articles for every single person who appears on a reality television show and for good reason. All the supposed references are dead links so I cannot vouch for their authenticity or substance. JBsupreme (talk) 09:25, 19 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. I restored that reference you deleted - apparently because you thought it was dead? It wasn't, just moved. We have reliable sources that meet GNG. The article can be greatly expanded just using those. The issues the article has can be addressed through regular editing which makes this not a good candidate for deletion. -- Banjeboi 09:30, 19 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Comment. For some odd reason nom has again removed one of the articles about this subject. I'll again re-add it in hopes it will remain this time. -- Banjeboi 09:33, 19 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Thanks for finding the new location of that article, I ran into a few edit conflicts with you while tagging dead links. In any case this artist still does not appear to be notable so I'll let this run its course. JBsupreme (talk) 09:36, 19 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  - All those dead links have also been fixed. I've also found a few more sources. If Curve is online I'll add that interview too. -- Banjeboi 10:27, 19 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Weak Keep. I checked the previous nom and searched for some sources, and the result is satisfactory to me. As I'm going home from work right now, I don't have time to sort it out in details, so it's a weak keep. Blodance the Seeker 09:58, 19 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 13:04, 19 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. Clearly passess the general notability guideline and criterion 1 of WP:BAND.--Michig (talk) 18:34, 19 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. Per above keeps.--Epeefleche (talk) 01:17, 21 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.