Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Flashline Games

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Daniel (talk) 23:16, 22 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Flashline Games

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Not notable; fails WP:GNG GloriaJFM (talk) 19:31, 15 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: per nom Bsoyka (talk · contribs) 19:41, 15 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - I can't find any sources for this. Fails GNG. Fails NCORP. None of the games produced are notable, so I imagine this fails any novel interpretation of a creative endeavor. 78.26 _{(spin me / revolutions)} 19:57, 15 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Florida-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 20:15, 15 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 20:15, 15 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Games-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 20:17, 15 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Administrator note: Nominator has been blocked for sockpuppetry. ✗plicit 13:25, 17 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Nom's misbehavior notwithstanding, the subject does fail WP:GNG. --_{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 05:04, 18 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.