Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Flexible modular scheduling

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. j⚛e decker ^talk 03:08, 29 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Flexible modular scheduling

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This article has been lacking any useful sources for years. While a google search shows this term exists, it does not appear to be notable. DES ^(talk) 04:02, 6 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Education-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 14:32, 7 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: The article is largely unsourced, and is not notable. There has been no opposition to the deletion of the article. 155blue (talk) 12:33, 10 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, MBisanz ^talk 00:48, 14 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Spirit of Eagle (talk) 05:31, 21 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete maybe only to wait for a better article because this certainly exists with searches here, here, here, here and here. DESiegel and 155blue, I wanted to notify you about these links. SwisterTwister talk 06:43, 27 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.