Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Florin Andronescu

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. The article does need some work and, hopefully, additional sources but I see the consensus here is that the sources that can be found lead to the subject passing GNG. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 20:52, 2 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Florin Andronescu

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Article is in bad shape and most of the sources are in Romanian, so it's hard to gauge how notable this entrepreneur/businessman is. The Romanian article doesn't help. - Mooonswimmer 14:25, 19 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

My suspicion is that the subject is notable. I agree it is difficult to read Romanian sources, but it isn't impossible. This one seems like quite an extensive article on him. This one seems to be a bit sychophantic but might be more independent than it first appears. JMWt (talk) 14:44, 19 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Businesspeople and Romania. Shellwood (talk) 14:55, 19 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Keep passes WP:GNG [1] [2] [3] [4] The forbes articles appear to be by staff writers and not forbes contributors, so they contribute to notability. W 42 17:27, 19 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Comment I don't know how correct it is to comment here, but in my opinion I tried to include only notable newspapers (they are in Romanian because I couldn't find others).--Samanthajjo (talk) 19:03, 20 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- Hello Samanthajjo, this is a discussion where editors are trying to determine whether Florin Andronescu is notable according to Wikipedia's standards for inclusion and you are welcome to participate. There is a guide to deletion that may answer more of your questions. W42 19:14, 20 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  - Hello Winner 42, I will familiarize myself with these policies in more detail. Thank you for always being available and responsive.--Samanthajjo (talk) 19:33, 20 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Star Mississippi 20:35, 26 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Keep Pass WP:SIGCOV, only independent and notable sources from the press are mentioned.--Samanthajjo (talk) 09:36, 27 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.