Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Forbes Haiti

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 22:35, 29 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Forbes Haiti

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

The actual thing that this article is referring to is a non-notable WordPress blog^{[1][2][3][4] all of these links are clearly not RSes but share the detail of being founded on Sep 19} which appears completely unaffiliated from the real Forbes. The sources are some apparently irrelevant IMF report and two Forbes pages that just happen to be about Haiti, nothing related to this blog. eviolite (talk) 23:17, 22 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: News media, Business, and Haiti. eviolite (talk) 23:17, 22 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - Not only is this not notable but there is no rational claim to significance. I believe that this is a candidate for speedy deletion and would have speedied it myself but thought that I should allow a short period for the author to demonstrate where notability lay. That period has elapsed and there is no notability. Velella ^{Velella Talk} 23:21, 22 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Not notable and without reliable sources. Agree with nomination--不和の林檎 (talk) 06:44, 23 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - Does not seem to pass WP:GNG. HumanBodyPiloter5 (talk) 12:36, 23 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete blog, likely a trademark infringement, possible copyvio. Delete. Oaktree b (talk) 00:32, 24 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - non-notable and unsourced; agree with nom. -- Asartea ^Talk ^| ^Contribs 16:23, 24 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, Unsourced , not notable, fails WP:GNG Alex-h (talk) 16:19, 25 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, Unsourced , not notable, fails. This user is creating uncontrolled pages for him and his businesses that do not meet Wikipedia's criteria. Please check its IP address with other already blocked usernames to get an idea. WP:GNG Accesswiki (talk) 7:37, 28 September 2022 (UTC)
Speedy delete. Per all above, Fails GNG & NMAG. Meets WP:A7 and maybe WP:A1. Bgv. (talk) 20:10, 29 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Delete Nothing notable found, not GNG.--Loewstisch (talk) 09:17, 30 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]