Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Forest Chainsaw Massacre

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Nakon 00:57, 23 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Forest Chainsaw Massacre

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Short film that I'm not sure if this really qualifies for wiki standards or not. Basically no reliable sources and that's it. Wgolf (talk) 02:29, 15 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of South Africa-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 03:14, 15 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Comics and animation-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 03:15, 15 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 03:15, 15 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. There are lots of hits for a 1987 incident where Mr. T decided to chop down all the trees on his property, but there are almost no hits at all for this film. Too bad, because it seems to have been created in an effort to increase coverage of African topics. There really isn't anything to say about this, however; short films often don't get any coverage. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 14:24, 15 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Dang that be a more amusing film lol. And that is true-unless if the short film got nominated for a Oscar they are likely not going to have a page (well that is for short films made probably in the past 40 years-old short films are much more well known). Wgolf (talk) 17:34, 15 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Delete Nothing to do with the Mr.T headache. It's a film by UNESCO and, even though verifiable as part of their permanent archives, UNESCO archives sadly are not "national archives" of any one particular nation. This will never hit the big screens in the US. If we could have confirmed it as having screened in festivals after 2010, I'd have gone with a keep. Schmidt, ^{Michael Q.} 05:18, 16 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Although there are obviously reliable sources that indicate this film *ahem* exists, there isn't anything much beyond that. I don't really see any way we can expand it beyond a stub. Luthien22 (talk) 21:22, 22 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.