Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Foster v. Wolkowitz
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. ✗plicit 07:16, 28 October 2021 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Foster v. Wolkowitz (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Apparently insignificant court case cited a grand total of 19 times according to Google. Couldn't find any real hits for either of the citations: 785 N.W.2d 59, 486 Mich. 356. AleatoryPonderings (???) (!!!) 03:20, 21 October 2021 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Law-related deletion discussions. AleatoryPonderings (???) (!!!) 03:20, 21 October 2021 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Michigan-related deletion discussions. AleatoryPonderings (???) (!!!) 03:20, 21 October 2021 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.